A03821
Beyond the Conventions
With varying degrees of confidence or even complacency, many people have assumed that the jig is almost up for the horrendous political era that began when George W. Bush became president. Always dubious, the assumption is now on very shaky ground.
The Bush-Cheney regime may be on its last legs, but a new incarnation of right-wing populism is shadowing the near horizon.
Much as modern capitalism is always driven to promote new products in the marketplace, the corporate-fundamentalist partnership must reinvent and remarket itself. We’re now seeing the rollout of a hybrid product under the McCain-Palin brand.
After watching Sarah Palin’s acceptance speech and the laudatory responses from many TV journalists, I remembered wandering around the floor of the Democratic convention in Denver. At the base, the two major parties are even more different than the speeches are apt to indicate.
Under the roof of the Democratic Party, notwithstanding its shades of corporatism and militarism and numerous other grave faults, there’s a lot of longstanding and ongoing involvement from key progressive constituencies — including labor unions, African Americans, gay rights activists, human rights defenders, environmentalists, fair-trade advocates, healthcare-for-all organizers, feminists, and on and on.
In contrast, the Republican Party is a political institution that views all such constituencies and activists (including the new target of GOP derision, “community organizers”) as enemies to be smothered and crushed. The party’s latest “populist” packaging is another wrinkle in a timeworn pattern; the most avid political servants of corporate elites are eager to keep generating the anti-elites rhetoric and imagery of down-home regular folks.
At the 2008 Democratic National Convention, some of the speeches ran counter to basic progressive tenets of peace and social justice. But none came close to the zeal for social Darwinism, jingoism and militarism routinely spewing from the Republican convention’s podium.
In ways too numerous to count and in realms too profound to truly evoke, this decade has grimly underscored that — notwithstanding theoretical claims to the contrary — it matters greatly who is president. From the Supreme Court to thousands of subcabinet positions to executive orders to a vast array of foreign-policy decisions including the potential use of nuclear weapons, the president is able to wield state power with consequences huge enough to be unfathomable.
A popular strand of analysis on the left has downplayed the importance of the president. The story goes that corporate forces rule, and the person in the Oval Office is little more than a figurehead for those rulers. There’s some validity to that assessment, but in the face of experience it has tended to calcify into a form of denial.
With right-wing Republicans running the White House for 20 of the last 28 years, maybe the downplaying of the importance of the presidency has become a kind of coping mechanism for some progressives. Accustomed to a status quo that grows increasingly dire, we’ve settled into an uncomfortable “comfort zone” as familiar as it is macabre. At the same time, the cascading effects of right-wing control over most of the federal government have been cumulative and devastating.
Of course progressives should always keep organizing, educating, protesting and agitating. But the potential for achieving progressive changes in government policies is severely limited while the right wing is entrenched in the White House. The changes we need can only be propelled from the grassroots, but the possibilities are badly circumscribed when the far right maintains a grip on state power.
After the election in early November, it’ll be President McCain or President Obama.
We’ll never pass this way again.
Norman Solomon, a national co-chair of the Healthcare NOT Warfare campaign, is the author of “War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death.” A documentary film of the same name, based on the book, has been released on home video. For information, go to: www.normansolomon.com.
Posted by anthony
Anthony Lappé is GNN's Executive Editor. He's written for The New York Times, Details, New York, Paper, The Fader and Vice, among many others. He has worked as a producer for MTV and Fuse. He is the co-author of GNN's True Lies and the producer of their Iraq doc,...











Under the Bush-Cheney administration, we had the biggest nat`nl economic and vetting security failures in contemporary history, 9/11, and the aftermath of the `05 hurricanes. The highest levels of the government committed witness tampering, document forgery ( recently reported), paid professional and financial kickbacks to colleagues to armtwist agencies, etc to falsely report the neccessity to Congress of offensively invading a country unrelated to 9/11, if that`s even a reasonable tactic. Dignitaries linked to the White House were recognized to have part in the authorized disclosure of a CIA operative and libeling of an ambassador.
There was the Congressionally sanctioned beginning of the ( hopefully ) temporary end of civil liberties and rights, the Patriot Act. And this whole Administration was initiated on state-per-state election results, nationwide, that were mildly put, questionably legitmate, in 2000. Yet, they got away with it all.
http://www.democrats.com/this-is-our-last-time
Found this op-ed on Obama`s speech.
If finishes with: This may be our last time.
Wrong. Won`t pass this way again? Yes, we will.
This bad? Maybe not. But considering there was supposed to already be an investigation into McCain`s financing, that disappeared from view, we`re getting a nice trailer. Wait for the movie.
Democrats good, Republicans bad. Too simple.
Democrats bad, Republicans so incredibly fucking bad i can’t articulate it. i’m voting for obama instead of nader (and instead of abstaining) just because his winning will piss off scum of the earth walmart execs, coal company officials, and glen beck. i know that obama’s reforms will only delay revolution.
we are doomed regardless of whoever the fuck is in there. one can only hope that the public embraces a socialist-anarchist solution after the collapse, rather than a hiterlesque or salem witch trial response. if this country elects Obama I will have a little more hope that the direction will be positive. if there are still enough people who can be duped by the Palin populism then we are fuck didly ucked.
rather than a hiterlesque or salem witch trial response
oh well I’d call the above something along the lines of post-collapse lite. Unfortunately it’ll probably be worse. Much worse, for a very long time.
haha. isn’t funny, don’t know why i laugh. you could be right.
in my wet dream, the collapse will make it clear that centralized governments are out of touch with constituents and thus corruptible; and capitalism is incompatible with environmental protection, social cohesiveness, and even personal happiness. This realization will spur a mass movement for local government, sustainable society, socialized everything, etc. Oh, and to top it off, we will execute the former ruling class. Only if the latter happens will we have justice. If a killer quits killing, it doesn’t mean that he has been brought to justice.
like i say, a wet dream… you are probably right
im voting for her. thats america right there i like that. no but really. in 2012 when the world ends im voting for nader.